Thursday, August 19, 2010

Clash of Civilizations


Paul Harvey used to preface some of his stories by saying, “It’s not one world.” It isn’t. Howard Dean has not suddenly become Republican or conservative. He is and will (most likely always) be a socialist. Hillary Clinton is a socialist. Obama, at the very least, is a socialist. ‘Big government’ is fundamental to socialist thinking.

At the same time, socialists are not suicidal. They do not check their common sense at the door. They know that in order to survive as a viable alternative, they cannot totally ignore certain political realities. For Muslims to build a 13-story mosque in close proximity to Ground Zero is simply a bad idea, unless we fail to understand that Muslims have declared war on us; that they cannot be appeased or bargained with; that any altruistic gesture we might intend will not make them like us, and will be proclaimed a victory for their side, allowing them to propagandize and recruit in continuance of their war against us.

In a recent exchange with a friend about ultimate causes, it came to me that the fundamental difference between man and animal is ego. I had it right, but I did not go far enough.

We’d been putting bones out on the driveway after supper with the expectation of seeing them gone by morning. We’d often wondered just who our nocturnal visitor might be. We imagined any number of the ‘friendly’ animals we’d become familiar with over the years of living here. After an overnight blanketing of fresh winter snow, their various tracks cross the lawn in every conceivable direction. Most of these we can readily identify.

Last night I had to go out for milk. When I returned, I happened to see the interloper in my headlights. I still can’t tell you what it was: larger than a cat; smaller than most dogs; large pointy ears; protruding snout; thin, spindly legs. There have been reports of fox and/or coyote in our neighborhood, but I’ve seen the fox in daylight and it wasn’t that.

I almost felt sorry for the intruder. He looked so frail and wobbly, and nervous to boot. We don’t put scraps out every day. I imagined him coming by on days when we don’t - and being hungry. It also occurred to me that he - as most any animal - had no arms and was obliged to eat directly off the ground. The difference between us, I reasoned, is that we at some point decided to get up on our hind legs and remained that way. This allowed our front legs to develop into arms, hands and fingers with which we could do things. We could now build something and say, “I did that. It’s mine.” - hence, ego.

Thought would develop similarly as well - based on differing assumptions - into different appendages. Ayaan Hirsi Ali in an opinion article in yesterday's WSJ entitled “How to Win the Clash of Civilizations” briefly summarizes the late Samuel Huntington’s assertion that “the essential building blocks of the post-Cold War world are seven or eight historical civilizations of which the Western, the Muslim and the Confucian are the most important.

The balance of power among these civilizations, Huntington argued, is shifting. The West is declining in relative power, Islam is exploding demographically, and Asian civilizations—especially China—are economically ascendant. Huntington also said that a civilization-based world order is emerging in which states that share cultural affinities will cooperate with each other and group themselves around the leading states of their civilization.

Ali concludes: “The West's universalist pretensions are increasingly bringing it into conflict with the other civilizations, most seriously with Islam and China. Thus the survival of the West depends on Americans, Europeans and other Westerners reaffirming their shared civilization as unique—and uniting to defend it against challenges from non-Western aggressors (sic)."

3 comments:

  1. Everyone should read that book or a summary. Huntington is right on. He also commented "the borders of Islam are singed with blood". Or something to that effect. Don't remember the exact quote as I read the book back in the 90's.

    Re the mosque. Hey they have a right to build it, just NOT a few blocks from Ground Zero. Why rub it in people's faces, or is that the intent? This is one issue I completely disagree with my liberal friends on. I look at it this way, a NYC condo board can deny anyone without any reason given. That also goes for new buildings, types of businesses etc. It has to meet the approval of the community, for example this is why there is no Wal-mart in NYC. New Yorkers don't want it. Is Wal-mart being discriminated against? Yup. But the community should have the final say. Ditto for Starbucks. The township of Maplewood in NJ refuses to allow any Starbucks in town, bowing to community pressure to resist chain stores from gaining a foothold. Is it right? Probably not, but the community has the final say. I see a similar situation with the mosque. The builders should listen to the community, if they are not welcome, they are not welcome, period end of discussion. It's inappropriate. They have their rights to build but trying to build someplace where you are not welcome is a statement in itself.

    ReplyDelete
  2. On one of my rare visits to the dark side of Rt. 22, I happened to note that practically the whole town of Westfield was given over to mall outlet stores.

    In Summit, where I live, Starbucks has become the place to hang out. It's all a question of balance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In Maplewood the place to hang out are the nail salons! The Star Ledger has designated us the nail salon capital of Joisey. What an honor! Given the mindset in Maplewood I think we'll probably see a mosque go up next to the country club before we will ever see a Statbucks!

    LOL

    ReplyDelete