Showing posts with label War. Show all posts
Showing posts with label War. Show all posts

Monday, May 2, 2011

Clouds Gathering


Things are starting to come into focus. Let’s stipulate for a moment that all we’ve been hearing is true; that Obama is actually native born, and that he succeeded in finding and killing Osama; that Osama hasn’t really been dead for years and that it’s not only just now that Obama is taking credit for his corpse. Let’s even say that Pakistan was involved in the ruse (which now seems likely) and that the whole thing hinged on a deal by which Obama get’s Osama and Pakistan gets Afghanistan. How does this help Obama?

Well, for one thing, judging from the reaction of both the left and right media, Obama is counting on his poll numbers to go up – and stay up. He’ll be able to say to the American public that the war in Afghanistan is now over and we can withdraw our troops. Americans would view this as welcome news and give full credit to our heroic and victorious president - and reelect him to a second term.

The problem is that the world has changed since 9/11. What has changed is that the Left and the Islamists are now united and are working in consort for a common goal. The movement that started with bin Laden is no longer strictly Arab based. It is based on the far broader idea of ending western capitalism. There are strong indications that Obama is quite on board with that. This would make POTUS our very own home-grown “Jihad Johnny” (Walker, a.k.a. ‘The American Taliban’).

The fly in the ointment is the Islamic inviolable desire to push Israel into the sea and that this must occur before anything else happens. POTUS has already shown himself as being no particular friend of Israel. Yet, he still depends heavily on (liberal) Jewish support. This would require him to play a double game. He must seem to please both the Arabs as well as the Jews.

The best way for him to proceed would be to work against Israel in a stealth manner. We note that every maneuver of his is designed to weaken Israel and strengthen her adversaries. It is my belief that he intends for Israel to fall while keeping his own hands clean. I do not believe this strategy will work. When push comes to shove, Israel will either successfully defend herself or receive help from an unexpected source. (China?)

At this point, the Left-Islamic coalition will come off the rails and the game will be exposed. The West will turn on a dime and fight back. None of this will be pretty to watch; but in the end all will turn out alright. The cleanup will be tremendous though. Economies will be in ruins and there will be plenty of blood. Islamists will meet up with their sainted martyrdom and the Left will be pursued to the ends of the earth.

We are reminded of the start of the Second World War. It’s difficult to imagine such a war without the U.S. being on the side of the good guys. But Germany turned out alright in the end, after everything was said and done. It’s just a shame that we will have to go through the whole mess all over again.

You might want to re-read my article entitled “The Tables Are Turning”, posted June 4th, 2010 for some background re elitism and how Israel fits into the overall picture.

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Sunday, May 1, 2011

S. And the Christmas Pig (with a name)


I understand the purpose of the last remaining stricture - against political assassination - left standing, even in the chaos of war. It is a concept also reflected in the game of chess. Assassination goes beyond mere killing. It targets a leader – the head the snake, in some cases – a man (or woman), nevertheless with a recognizable name. It violates the last law of civilized behavior after which there is no telling.

S. was a little boy living in Goa. It wasn’t the place of his birth or even where he grew up. His parents moved around a lot due to the nature of his father’s job. S. used to like watching the yard from his second floor window. He watched the cow being milked and the chickens. His very favorite was the pink piglet with the curly tail. He gave it a name and it would follow him around when he went down to the yard to play.

Came Christmas, there was much activity down in the yard. S. had been struggling to stay awake the night before. Midnight mass seemed to drag on endlessly. Around daybreak he finally fell asleep. Consequently, he awoke late. It was already time for the holiday feast served on a festive table at midday. When S. came downstairs, the heavily laden table was the first thing he saw. In the center was his pig – the one with a name. It had an apple in its mouth.

S. ran back upstairs weeping. He could not eat that day.

The assassination of a leader is considered by some to be the most effective way to rid oneself of an adversary. And perhaps it is. But it flies in the face of any shred of doubt one may still harbor as to the rightness or wrongness of one’s intent. There must always be doubt. Without doubt, there is no countervailing force to mitigate madness, and it’s off to the races. Why not target Ahmadinejad, Mugabe, or Kim Jong-Il? We know where they live.

Of all the palpable threats that are facing our nation, I consider Barack Hussein Obama to be at the top of the list. Still, I would shudder if he were to be assassinated. It would mean that we have stepped over and obscured a very delicate line. It would be difficult – if not impossible – to find our way back to any semblance of normal.

Targeting Kaddafi is wrong. I know the sainted Reagan did it. He was wrong as well. Kaddafi may have been tipped off as he might have been tipped off also this time around (I should like to believe so).

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Blowing Up Bridges

It’s on! The trash talking has begun. And make no mistake, it’s being encouraged by the White House. Expect one of the dirtiest campaigns in recent history.

We are all the same. It should be easy to find common ground. It is not. Enter ideology. Ideology forces us into templates that do not fit well. It tends to pervert our true natures - to live and let live - and puts the accent on confrontation. This is generally needed in times of war - in the face of threat. In peacetime it seems a silly way to behave.

Since Barack Hussein Obama has been in office, there has been no peace. It’s almost as if, while we were living our lives, draft notices began arriving in the mail. We’ve been forced to take sides - one side being America.

Obama is a warrior alright, even if Libya doesn’t quite speak to the issue. Warriors do not compromise. They dismiss the broad range of the painter’s palette and divide the world into black and white. Again, this is only appropriate to war.

“You’re either for us, or against us.” No shades of gray even.

Who is POTUS fighting? America, of course. This has been hard for Americans to swallow. They thought he was on their side.

Similarly, it’s been difficult to square POTUS’ color scheme. The white hats have traditionally been ‘good’; the black hats, ‘bad‘. We’ve been taught this from watching John Wayne westerns. POTUS is black and tells us he’s white - while he paints us black as sin.

Something does not add up here. We’ve known it from the start. Now we’re starting to feel uncomfortable with it. We read about the soldiers in Syria who are refusing to shoot protesters being shot by their own - the worst of all fates. We wonder about how the term ‘conscientious objector’ might fare in this climate.

Voting for a black president was supposed to solve all this. We thought it would bridge the eternal divide. Instead, we find the existing bridges blown up and not enough shovel-ready jobs to build new ones. Sources tell us that China is building bridges like crazy - while we are tearing ours down. Some of us are trapped behind enemy lines.

Carlos Castaneda tells us that each life represents a complete, self-contained universe; that two people standing side by side must be seen as two such universes; that these cannot be commingled, except by event affecting both. Ideology disregards the deeper meaning of this lesson. It seeks to bridge chasms (that cannot be bridged) by hostile rhetoric, fomenting non-existent threat and, finally, by outright aggression. Thereby, the individual is lost and replaced by ordinance.

Love lost in the ashes of ritual (s)laughter.

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Sick of Hearing Gibberish

There's something going on. Last week it was the moon being too close to the earth. This week it's Saturn. In Iran they're predicting the Madhi's return within months if not weeks. NASA is out watching for meteorites and space junk converging on earth. Batchelor is announcing the meltdown of Japan. Republicans are predicting financial collapse in the U.S. In New York they’re finding the remains of dead prostitutes along a remote beach road on Long Island. Can a major DOH announcement be far behind?

We've heard virtually all of this before and yet we’re all still here. Y2K never materialized, neither did swine or bird flu ravage the planet as predicted. This just goes to show, that every run of excess carries with it its own natural antidote; something working to keep things in check. Sometimes it's as brutal as starvation, war, and pestilence.

We're not quite there yet, but excess is invariably programmed to self-correct. Man can only stand by and watch excesses wax and wane. Often excess is met head on with excess and the two cancel each other out.

The tea parties, for example, arose out of excess by government. Liberalism arose from an excess of conservatism. Now we’re moving the other way. Any move has chaos as for a brother. Inertia is death. The stock market moves up and down, but it moves.

Where there is movement there is life. Where there is life there is death. Is there a balance?

Most assuredly so: We are always in balance. Sometimes it’s weighted to the left; sometimes to the right, but balanced nonetheless.

Shiva dancing in the bone yard: Someone always dances. Someone always provides the inert platform for the performance. Kaddafi is performing, and will do so until his legs are cut out from under him. Then, it will be Osama's turn to dance for a while.

Are we dancing? Individually (perhaps), yes. Some of us are. As a group, though, we've slunk out of the ballroom; wallflowers peeling away from the wall; sick of hearing gibberish.

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Freak Show

A close friend - who doesn’t live in America and, hence, doesn’t know America in the way I do - claims that the reason America involves itself endlessly in war is because it is a relatively young nation, eager to flex its young muscles. She theorizes thus, quite without malice, as if commenting on the antics of kittens tumbling about on the living room floor. Accepting her premise, I must say that I’ve watched America aging precipitously ever since Vietnam. In fact, the trend seems to have accelerated over the years to where our overall policy now appears to be all but in its death throes.

Domestically too, we seem to have adopted a model that is a throwback to the past. Communism and, in a sense, theocracy have been resurrected from a well deserved grave only to die again. America, as she had been only recently, was the future; the very model of modern success, to which the whole world flocked in droves even as this same world now retreats in utter disgust from this house of the dying, built on a jumble of acronyms.

War, by definition, is chaos. It makes no sense to impose rules on it. It makes even less sense to go in without any notion of victory. It is no accident that 60% of U.S. casualties in Afghanistan so far have died under Obama. It was Obama who changed the rules of engagement and struck the words ‘war’ and ‘victory’ from military manuals. It is Obama who doesn’t understand the difference between war and a police action.

The latter does not bode well for us here on the home front as well. Were we ourselves ever to contemplate rising up against the oppressive boot of our own government – after all constitutional measures have failed – who is now to say what Obama, or any leader of his ilk, would use his army for?

In past African wars, the European gentry used to gather on the surrounding hills with their sun shades and picnic baskets to watch. The distance made the dying anticeptic. Are we actually thinking of reviving this freak show?

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Soros: What's In A Name?

I don't understand why we don't see it. We've erased the word 'war'. We've erased the word 'victory'. We're working on erasing Israel. Who does it benefit? Answer: Iran. We've got Iran in the White House!

We can tell Obama all we want about what he should do. He won’t listen. In fact, by telling him, he’ll know to do exactly the opposite. We can tell him to lower taxes, cut regulations, allow drilling, etc. There are a lot of very good and time-tested ideas floating around. It won’t matter. His goals are fundamentally different from ours. And until we accept this, and see it for what it is, we will continue on our downward trajectory.

I’m not even blaming Obama. He’s just a water boy for the big man who’s pulling the strings: George Soros. Soros appears to have some giant mad chip on his shoulder about having been born a Jew. There’s nothing more lethal than a self-hating Jew. (Hitler is said to have had a similar hang-up.)

Soros’ name changed three times. Brings to mind all the social security numbers that have been attributed to Barry S. ‘Soros’, the name that stuck, is a palindrome. That makes it special. It also means ‘next in line’ or ‘designated successor’ in Hungarian; and ‘will soar’ in Esperanto. George was taught Esperanto from birth. I need hardly explain the significance of Esperanto to this audience.

The evidence suggests that Soros engineered Obama’s electoral victories. It’s not a stretch to assume that he even now controls the lad.

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

WAR: Comic Relief

Everywhere I turn today on the radio dial, I hear the usual yuck-yucks and clucks about what Obama did today. The war in Libya is topic number one of course. Japan has fallen to a distant third behind the many marriages of Elizabeth Taylor. Actually, the past few days we’ve seen very little of Obama. It has been Hillary Clinton who’s been out front, trying to explain this and that.

What’s curious about this is that war isn’t at all funny. The yuck-yucks center on the administration’s failure to explain how we got into it and what we can expect. The details we’re given change by the hour and are often contradictory. For instance, Obama claims that it’ll last just a few more days with us in charge, and then we’ll hand it off to some unspecified 'other'. Then, we learn, that nobody else wants it. It’s like watching a group of kids playing hot potato. Or, the kitchen sink gets clogged and we go in with all kinds of ‘shock and awe’ (to borrow a phrase). We ask the kid next door to come over and help. All he brings with him is a screwdriver while we’ve got the 130 ft. snake out. Whom are we hoping to hand off to? It’s comical, in a macabre kind of way. But here we are. The Germans have already pulled out. NATO is hiding in the tall grass. The others were never in. ‘Allies in disarray’ is how Drudge put it.

We’ve seen this before: an administration getting pummeled for deciding to go to war. Whether Kaddafi lives or dies is almost beside the point. It almost seems like the U.S. president is always the ultimate target of our scorn and ridicule; that as soon as any U.S. leader orders military intervention, it’s like, at the same time, he’s holding a loaded gun to his own head.

You might get the impression from reading this blog that I dislike Obama. The truth is I really don’t dislike him at all. His exploits have taken us in many unforeseen (and foreseen) directions. It’s been a blessing to be alive during these times of tumultuous change. The Obamas (in one incarnation or another) have always been with us. We’ve just never put them in charge of anything before. This time we did. And what did we expect? We got exactly what we voted for.
----------------------------------------------
On today’s Glenn Beck radio program, the name Stephen Lerner surfaced in connection with a union plot to collapse the American economy. Later in the day, Limbaugh also spent a segment on it. This seems consistent with what happened before (just preceding the 2008 election). When the Justice Department was notified, they ignored what must surely constitute a serious threat. Say, the kid with the screwdriver (above) goes home and were to fantasize on Facebook about putting that screwdriver of his through Obama’s eye; he would no doubt get a visit from the Secret Service before sundown. Lerner, apparently is playing for the right team (unions). So, we can assume he can happily fly under the radar, as far as Big Sis is concerned.

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Friday, March 11, 2011

The Music Of the Primes


A guitar can be considered both, a musical instrument as well as percussion. Therefore a man alone with a guitar can often make credible music. Percussion came first - the big bang - then another, and another (echoes)… Then came a more gentle sound, probably in the form of wailing. When the wailing adapted itself to the beat, music was born. Finally, there was the ‘word’ and history began in earnest.

Similarly, harmony is a blend of the secular and the spirit. For the spirit to soar, it needs the discipline of a steady pulse. There has been undue emphasis on just pulse lately. Sound has been allowed to become discordant - the din of people expressing disparate agonies - every nation divided, pulling both ways. Voices shouting slogans in short, bumper sticker bursts mimic the staccato of an incomplete drum set. It has become a lingering sign of our times - 'The WHO' destroying their instruments at the end of the set. Drumsticks tossed into the audience. What are they going to do with them except clobber each other?

We are regressing. The drums of war are heard all around. Even God has been roused from his lofty abode and is seen hurling lightning bolts mindlessly here and there. The ground under Haiti trembles, and over a year later we still cannot cope. Iran threatens, and we shrink from our duty to stop it. And today, Japan stands helplessly while watching a wall of water advancing.

America too watches helplessly as it is being consumed by a tsunami of debt. In New York, the most expensive musical ever is being kept off-line while the bodies drop from the wires.

Curious about Spiderman: The day before Glenn Beck quit the airwaves in New York, he delivered and impassioned endorsement of Spiderman. He claimed that it represents a huge step forward in live theater, akin (perhaps) to switching from watching black and white to color TV. He spent a full half hour praising this show, saying (and I paraphrase) it is definitely worth the price of an over-inflated ticket and even the added cost of a flight from anywhere.

I remember thinking that Beck might simply be honoring some contractual obligation. Or, did he really believed what he was saying? I was torn, but leaning towards the latter. For one thing, he had high praise for the script (and music). He warned that liberals - especially New York liberals - would not like the story. Ticket sales spiked immediately after Beck’s show. Then, other reviews started filtering in. These, as expected, were overwhelmingly negative.

It is entirely possible that a conservative narrative cannot survive on Broadway. In today’s hyper-partisan climate, even the skeletal music of Bono, it seems, cannot endure the drumming of the ideological fist.

While in many ways the staccato bursts of gunfire in the Middle East seem to dominate our own narratives, 'The WHO’s classic coda to “My Generation” comes immediately to mind. And with it, the final scene of smashed guitars and sparking amplifiers.

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Friday, March 4, 2011

Going Too Fast to Take the Exits


We have now reached the point I have been warning about. The state of our nation is anything the government says it is. “The economy has turned the corner” and, poof! the stock market goes through the roof; “eight million jobs saved”, and, shebang! it is so; “companies have resumed hiring” and, would you believe it? (Obama is a genius!) Unemployment goes from nearly 10% to barely 9 (the new norm), and, again, Obama is simply the best!!! “Oil prices will not spur inflation” and, miracles of miracles… “We are winning the war.” Really?

How can we possibly oppose the policies that have brought about such incomparable blessings? All throughout the Middle East and beyond, democratic movements have awakened and unseated long-entrenched tyrants and placed power into the people’s hands. And we did it all without firing a shot. Here at home, we’re standing up for workers’ rights; a chicken in every pot; a roof over every head; heath care for all; etc.

He (Obama) will go down in history as the greatest American president since Lincoln, or is it Roosevelt? Or Reagan? Or Washington? (Let me check my calendar.) Only bright days ahead. A nation powered by shiny new high speed (can we still say, ‘bullet') trains and batteries; wind and solar power. …clean, crystalline air to breathe. No one smokes. Everyone eats healthy - and not too much. Utopia is truly within our grasp.

This one is a keeper. This president. The best we’ve ever had. Why bother with any more elections? This is a good as it gets. Boy, are we ever lucky!
------------------------------------------------------------
"We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analyzing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will. I cannot believe that such a program would be rejected by the people of this country (England), even if it does mean the establishment of personal contact with the dictators."

- Neville Chamberlain.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely riveting broadcasting last night, John. I had dozed off with my radio on. Was literally frightened awake by the raw energy emanating from your segment with Malcolm Hoenlein alone. You turned into a pit bull and would not let go. You got Malcolm to say what he didn’t want to say. You got him to admit that Iran is winning.

I understood Malcom’s reticence. It was so obvious the man was struggling, stumbling. He fully grasped the import of the words that you so pitilessly coaxed from his convulsing throat. He understood what it means for Israel.

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Circuses and Rights During Wartime


Interesting how Congress has been reduced to gimmicks. Interesting how appearances are used to overshadow fundamental differences that are said to exist between Republicans and Democrats. Perhaps the lesson here is that there really is no difference; that it’s all a part of the same dysfunctional, irrelevant stew - or worse. The only voice that matters is POTUS’. Without cut-out POTUS, no one would be there, dressed in finery, kissing and hugging; beaming and patting backs. It’s a carnival barker‘s paradise put on every year for the amusement of themselves, and so-called political pundits. “…and let’s all meet afterwards for drinks.”

The public remains the foil. All that will be said and done will be tailored to appeal to TV couch potatoes. Remind that last year’s theme was ‘focusing on jobs‘ (like a laser). What happened to all those jobs? Fool me once…

The most memorable of these presidential high-performances (in my lifetime, at least) was back when LBJ announced he won’t be running for a second full term. Now that was news! It sent shock waves throughout the nation. Dare we hope for anything of substance?
------------------------------------------------------------
Make no mistake about it, yesterday’s bombing of the airport in Moscow was an attack on all of us. We diminish what happened when we ask why? The fact is, we do not understand the motives of terrorists. In last night’s interview with Stephen F. Cohen the word ‘Islam’ was mentioned exactly once.

The word ‘terrorist’ explains nothing - no motive; no philosophical or historical underpinnings - only nihilism. Seeking explanations under such conditions inevitably brings us back to ourselves. We are at fault - the enduring mantra of narcissists.

There are infinite explanations for why this may be so. The most plausible both start with ‘p’: ‘poverty’ and ‘politics’. There are infinite reasons that argue against both. This whole terror thing has become a (war) dance. The terrorists lead; we follow. We screen ourselves before getting on an airplane. The terrorists change tactics. They target innocents waiting for loved ones to arrive. We increase security perimeters. The terrorist target public places. We put up cameras on street corners. They send mail bombs consisting of wires, then powders, then liquids…

There is no winning this. We must be persuaded to lead. We must fight fire with fire. We must do as they do. Only, we must be smarter about it. We must lead. It does us no good to chuckle about Mr. Putin’s embarrassment as he chuckles about ours. We’re all in this together. We must work together - not celebrate momentary relief that it wasn‘t us (this time).

This is war. All is fair in love and war. In war, conventional niceties go out the window. We must do what they do. We must blow up their stuff. We must not play footsies with nations who sponsor terrorism - as Putin continues to do wit Iran. We cannot continually appease and change the language to reflect a fiction.

We must begin to close their mosques, bar them from our shores and send home those who are already here. Sure, it’s unfair. Many good people will suffer inconvenience. But aren’t we inconvenienced by them. Never once have anyone of us heard anything even close to condemnation from their side. Their silence makes them accomplices. Change must come from within. Perhaps once they are back home, they will change things. Why is the onus always on us - to change?

Muslim countries routinely attack Christians and Jews. In some, Christians and Jews are prohibited from even being there. Fine. It’s their turf. I know many families who wont allow smoking or guns in their homes. It is their right.

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Crushed


Bahukutumbi Raman has been in the forefront of raising deeply troubling issues about Pakistan as it exists today. Pakistan is considered to be an ally of the U.S. Indeed, even if it weren’t, it would almost have to have been invented. Pakistan is said to have an arsenal of nuclear arms. It is one of the primary bases from which we fight terrorism in Afghanistan.

Those who have studied Pakistan have been warning that Pakistan may not be all it’s been cracked up to be. For one thing, Pakistan is deeply divided. This division has fissures extending into every Pakistani heart. On one hand, Pakistanis are a proud people who wish to join the modern world and be respected within it. On the other, there are those who have not exactly embraced modernity. This too springs of pride; only, it is a ruthless, savage pride that seeks to dominate and oppress on a most basic level. Modern weapons have exceeded their usefulness in curbing such appetites.

As such, when we speak of Pakistan, we speak of separate factions, each with its own way of doing things. An agreement with one will fail to satisfy the other.

The primary victims of Pakistani chaos are the majority of its people who are people like any other. It is they who are caught between a rock and a hard place, and suffering. Second, it is a threat to India. Pakistan has never healed from the partition which Gandhi and Jinnah engineered in the interest of peaceful coexistence. Jinnah demanded a separate Muslim nation to which Gandhi acquiesced.

The only difference between India and Pakistan is their religions. India’s (by no means less intense) devotion to Hinduism nevertheless remains tolerant of other religions and has been able to move forward in important areas under the banner of a more or less secular approach. Pakistan (and the Middle East in general) has not.

As Pakistan fell further and further behind, the need to blame others became acute. It did not help for Western nations to exploit Pakistan’s despair. Now Pakistan has become a problem that threatens to plunge the world into all-out war. It’s primary ally is China. (America only pretends to be allied with Pakistan for media consumption.) China, too, will not be able to deal with the chaos that is Pakistan. It will continue to promote and use such as it is for its own purposes.

There are now many who are deeply entrenched inside Western camps who seek to destroy capitalism. Islam’s goal is the same. Pakistan (and Islam in general) is being used to undermine the West. It is only a tool (and tools can never exceed their specific function). In the end, Islam has no prayer of winning. When all is said and done; it, along with Western liberals (useful idiots), will be crushed.

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Monday, December 20, 2010

China Laughing While U.S. Downgrades Military To Paintball


Why even bother to report it? (North Korea's continued provocations.) We no longer have a dog in the fight. We’ve shown quite unambiguously that we are no longer interested in fighting/winning. We seem to be intent on castrating our armed forces. We no longer see them as a blunt tool to support our now thoroughly compromised diplomacy; rather, we are in the process of re-shaping this once awesome tool to reflect some ‘less is more’ ideology with the vague expectation that the world will think this is great and follow our lead.

The damage this president has done to our military in his two years in office is astounding. First, he has ordered it to engage in a war without aiming to win. He has placed restrictions on our fighting men and women that make it difficult even to stay alive. Wikileaks enters into it at some level, as does the heroic repeal of ’don’t ask, don’t tell’.

I predict within less than a year, the military will be hard up for recruits and we may have to revert to something akin to the draft. The outlines of this are already apparent: amnesty for service. Until now, we have seen very few minorities among our fighting forces in Afghanistan and Iraq. This has to be pointed out because the Left has up until recently always falsely claimed that America only sends it minorities oversees and into harm’s way to fight it’s dirty wars. (They’ve since had to be content with complaining about the relatively high incarceration rate among certain minority communities.) All this will change.

Prisoners will now fight ‘clean’ wars. They will not be expected to win - only to stay alive while ordered to hand out food and bandages to the starving and wounded. Military missions oversees will likely evolve into setting up abortion and sex clinics, and (don’t forget) welfare offices, thus providing an ever escalating stream of entitlement clientele for liberals here at home to administer.

It is unlikely that China will go along with the program though, admittedly, they may laugh themselves silly and thus suffer some minor set-backs in their quest to take over the world.

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Sunday, December 5, 2010

Left Hook: War

Wars are the milestones of human history. Wars mark beginnings. They also signal ends. As such, they chart our progression from one generation to the next, and so on… On our concept circle, war and peace are represented by a single point; they are two sides of the same coin. War is not the opposite of peace just as peace is not the opposite of war. Each is merely the (temporary) absence of the other. That is why war and peace can exist simultaneously – in different places; at different times; and within separate chambers of the human heart - each failing to appreciate the eternal presence of the other in what essentially amounts to a charade of willful delusion.

Some people wage war, while others wave peace signs. What protesters fail to see is that their placards proclaiming PEACE have “WAR” written on the on the backs of them. (No one alive is excused from a conflict that directly involves his/her immediate neighbors.) The difference lies in the consequences. Those fighting in the trenches are putting their lives on the line. They are the true heroes of any struggle. Those waving signs on the (America’s) home front risk nothing save being exploited by the enemy, which ultimately brands them quite rightly as traitors.

It might even be said that peace is a precondition for war; that peace itself foments the poisons that eventually force men into battle; that the lax chaos underlying outward tranquility allows for inequities to build, until these then must topple under their own weight. The laws of survival during war are far less forgiving after all.

Man is far too imperfect a being to determine his own destiny. Every human at some point succumbs to disease and dies. The cause of his death is almost always traced back to the way he has lived his life - some imbalance; some indiscretion; some repeated compulsion to top-off a perceived void - that ultimately sends him off into the next world. This is the human condition. How can any one of us - so attached to sensory comfort; so lacking in focus and self-control - be expected to chart the destinies of ourselves; our families, even; much less the destinies of corporations, nations – the world? It continues to be the duty of a higher power to unleash plagues; and, yes, wars when appropriate; to dispatch scalding siroccos across the land in order to disinfect it, make it clean once more, and give us all the opportunity for a fresh start.

And again we talk of duality. We try to ascribe bad decisions to bad results; good decisions to good results without necessarily appreciating the bias we thereby openly exhibit. We say the Buddha died from eating bad meat. It would never occur to us to say that the Buddha died of eating ‘good’ meat - or that he simply died (because his time was up). There must always be a cause. In the Buddha’s case it is said to have been meat - and now we proclaim ourselves vegetarian.

Some have sought to break the cycle of history by (the) diplomacy (of delay) or by outright appeasement. This has only lead to even greater disasters as evidenced by numerous past debacles. Success or failure in diplomacy eludes objective measurement (such as body counts) and can be manufactured to fit any template. The latest effort centers on a strategy termed 'containment'; allowing conflicts to fester in the hope that they will eventually go away. Clearly, so much discontent is currently being stoked the world over – such dearth of leadership; so many hearts aflame - it’s hard to know exactly where the firebreaks we’ve attempted to enforce will be breached first.

In human history one third is given over to war, while two thirds is given to peace (or the absence of war). War continues to be the domain of the young; the virile; the idealists. It is a tool meant to be grasped by those with the courage to pursue (or protect) a vision. Once one’s own vision has failed, the challenge is never far. One must either fight blind or yield. In the Hindu trinity, war is represented by Shiva (the destroyer) who is by far the most popular in the trinity of gods.

War is a wound that never heals. We are forever tempted to scratch it open for the fascination of watching it bleed. Even in peace, the memory of past wars continues to haunt us. Even in peace, the prospect of the next one is just over the horizon. That’s why we urge our populations to support armies that stand idle two-thirds of the time.
------------------------------------------------------

ONE: Omi (Grandmother)

Only a short bit of cobblestone is visible from the third floor window of my prison cell. The rest of the view is marred by red roofs cutting randomly across an endless proliferation of stark, gray walls with windows in which the curtains are always drawn. Above this hangs the sky, suspended as if from a noose. It has become of primary interest to some of my mates who have learned to predict the weather with astounding accuracy.

I allow myself a few moments each day to survey this scene. For me, the sky is of little interest. Even when clear, it sprawls like a corpse atop its mother, smothering her under its foul weight. From my vantage point, only my visible section of cobblestone street remains immune to the stench of this place. It is there that I watch for the changing styles of which I am no longer a part.

Today it is raining. I see a small boy with bare knees skipping across my severely restricted view of freedom. The white fabric of his uniform shirt clings to his back. A book bag is carelessly slung across his shoulder. …and then he is gone.

I check my watch. It is still too early for school. I imagine him to be going to see his grandmother. He does so (usually after school) two or three times a week even though his mother has strictly forbidden it.

He would have gone yesterday, but it had been the day of the soccer match between our town and the next one just up the river. It has always been a great rivalry. No boy would have missed it, even for a grandmother’s chocolate bribes.

Still, it had been a sacrifice for the boy, tempered in part by the fact that our town had won the match in the final moments of the game. Today he would make up for it by getting there early to see if she needed anything. It is Wednesday, market day, when farmers from the surrounding hills set up their stalls in the square. Sometimes the old woman would send him out for vegetables. The boy knows it isn’t likely today, for she had not been feeling well and would not be inclined as to spend much time in the kitchen. Still, it would ease his conscience a bit to have made the effort. He takes a certain measure of pride in being the only one in his family to show decency to one who – for no reason he can fathom – is shunned by the rest.

It wasn’t until third grade that the boy even knew of his grandmother’s existence. He had fallen ill while at school. His teacher suggested that he be brought over to his grandmother’s house while efforts were underway to contact his mother. (The old woman lived just two short blocks away from the school.)

Within an hour’s time, his mother had come storming in, wordlessly gathered his things and brought him home by hired car. She made him promise never to go there again. She gave no reason. Her manner was such as to preclude further questioning. His father only shrugged and turned away when the boy asked him about it later.

The boy had been intrigued to find that he too had a grandmother. The other kids had them – grandfathers, too – kindly old people who sometimes knew things about which parents generally had no clue. He had gone back there as soon as he was well again, ostensibly to thank her. It was the proper thing to do despite what his mother might have thought. But he was also curious.

The old woman welcomed him with open arms. She had sweets for him - and toys. Curiosity gave way to genuine affection when he found her to connect with his own thoughts and feelings as few others could. By mutual, silent consent, the problem with mother was never broached.

Today he would bound up the rain-slick steps to the door of his grandmother’s house. He would knock repeatedly but no one would answer. Finally, he would take the key from under the mat and let himself in.

He is immediately struck by how cold it is in her rooms. An unseen presence seems to be roaming the house at will, touching everything at once - dust bunnies dance on floors; curtains wave; lamp shades sway.

The boy rushes to shut the windows one by one. Then he enters her bedroom. Here too, the windows are wide open. Papers lie scattered all over the room.

After the last of the windows has been closed, the customary quiet returns. In the half light the boy sees the old woman in her bed, deeply submerged in sleep.

“Omi, wake up! It is I, Uwe. I have come,” he whispers repeatedly close to her ear, but is afraid to touch her. Finally he quits, realizing that she would never hear him again.

The boy sits down beside her on the bed and cries. He knows it was the raw night air that had killed her. It was his fault, he thinks. Had he come yesterday, she would have asked him to shut the windows. She had been sick and couldn’t get up to do it herself; …but how did the windows get opened in the first place?

Slowly, the outlines of the room come clearer to his bloodshot eyes. At his feet lies a folded scrap of notebook paper. He picks it up absentmindedly, half meaning to toss it back under the bed, when he recognizes his mother’s hand(writing). It’s a shopping list. On it he reads the ingredients it took for her to prepare last night’s meal.

The boy runs his sleeves over his face. He gets up and goes into the sitting room where his electric train is set up. He begins by taking the tracks apart. Then, he reassembles all the straight sections, adding a single curved track at one end which allows him to electrify the rest. Now, he carefully sets his engine down on the curved piece.

Manning the controls, he tests his work by slowly running his engine end to end. It takes several passes and numerous track adjustments until he is satisfied that electricity runs smoothly throughout the system. Finally, he jams his controls on full throttle, sending the little engine roaring at full speed down the straightaway. When it reaches the end, he watches as it leaves the track and crashes into the wall, splintering a section of baseboard on impact. He retrieves the engine and tries it again; but, this time, the engine no longer works.

A number of his wind-up toys also lie about in the room. It is on these that he focuses next, taking each one in turn, winding it until the spring snaps. All the while, the expression on the child’s face betrays no emotion. He persists, as if driven, in rendering useless each of the things he had once loved.

Incredibly, after all has been destroyed, he reconstructs the room exactly as it had been. Even the wind-up key is put back in its proper place. In the end, any casual observer might have concluded that nothing had been touched; only, that a section of baseboard in the sitting room had somehow become damaged.

The boy returns to his grandmother’s side. He notes that she seems to be smiling. He goes over to the black trunk beside her bed and tries the lid. It is locked. He knows that she keeps the key under her pillow. He hesitates before reaching to feel around for it. He shudders, sensing the weight of her head on his hand. He is just about to withdraw when he touches the key with the tips of his fingers. He sweeps it out, sending it flying across the room. Finding it again, he unlocks the trunk and raises the lid.

It is nearly empty. A packet of faded photographs, secured with a rubber band, lies at the bottom along with various documents, yellowed with age. There is also a shoe box containing jewelry and a man’s pocket watch. Lastly, there is a leather purse containing a thick wad of bills.

The boy takes only the money and stuffs it into the pockets of his shorts. Then, after having put everything back just as it was, he closes the lid and locks it. He studies the key in his open hand before putting it with the money he had taken.

Just then, the church bell tolls eight times. School would be starting momentarily. The boy knows he should hurry. He checks the room once more for anything he might have missed. His eyes are no longer that of a child. He notes the several sheets of lead-colored stationary lying on the floor opposite the windows. He goes to gather them up. As was the case with the grocery list earlier, he recognizes his mother’s script. Though entirely legible, it is not written in a language he knows. Nevertheless, he decides to stash these in his book bag for possible future reference. Then he heads out into the morning, making certain that the front door is locked and the key is put back under the mat.

The rain has stopped. Already the wind has dried most surfaces. Only puddles remain to tell of the deluge earlier. There are no school-age children about. The boy will be late. Ordinarily this would worry him. His is a nation where being late for anything is taken as a sign of lax moral character. Consequently, punctuality was fervently promoted on all levels. It was not uncommon for a child to be beaten for arriving late at school.

Today, understandably, there are other things on the boy’s mind.


TWO

That boy was me some thirty odd years ago. Overnight, the rules that applied to my peers no longer applied to me. For one thing, judging by any standard, I was now quite wealthy. School was no longer important as a vehicle for eventually finding a well-paying job. For another, my mother’s authority over me had suddenly lifted. Never again was she to tell me outright what to do. Though, I must admit, there were times I could have used some guidance.

She seemed to suspect something, even without my breathing a word of my own suspicions, much less confronting her with the grocery list. She seemed resigned to leave her fate – and mine – in the hands of a child.

She died ten years later of unspecified causes. Barely six months after, my father died in an automobile accident. I didn’t go to either funeral. I traveled a lot because I could afford it. In city after city, I wore out my welcome with the arrogant nature I’d adopted. My problems would generally begin with the women I met. Invariably, fathers, brothers, uncles, cousins – entire families – would come out of the woodwork to pose their threats. Somewhere I left a son. It became a source of continuing amazement to me how quickly I could turn a whole town against me.

As time went on, I found it increasingly difficult to hang on to my money. My appetites were out of control. In one last, desperate effort to turn a profit, I invested all I had left in an illegal venture that would ultimately land me here. Every day since then, I have cursed the woman who put me here – my mother. May she rot ion hell!

Final Thoughts

One thing prison lets you do is think. I must have gone over it a thousand times, and it’s every bit like death itself: the barren landscape of my past stretching endlessly before me, as in a painting. And I am unable to go back and change even a single brush stroke.

I search the canvas for my son. But this only brings me face to face with yet another in a series of disappointments, each one leading to the next and so on, up to and including the present moment.

I have come to identify a pattern in my behavior which, never questioned, remained unchallenged. And so, the result from the beginning was never really in doubt. I traced this pattern to its conception and arrive back on the day on which I found my grandmother dead. How I wish now, I would have left that old trunk alone, for it marked the beginning of my fall from grace. As I have never doubted my mother’s guilt in the affair, it became all too convenient for me to blame her for all that would follow.

The mind is an indefatigable instrument. Left to its own devices, it will continue to erode the brittle fabric of delusion until only truth remains. Though reluctantly, I have come to accept responsibility for my own actions. And with it came the realization that I didn’t hate my mother nearly as much as I hated myself.

I know now that there are no beginnings; that each thing that happens is based on what came before. It is for this reason that I should have confronted my mother long ago. But there’s comfort in half-truths and hatred protects that which is easily hurt. And now it’s too late, for with death the paint defining human relationships dries and becomes permanent.

Curiously, I may always have held the key as to the truth behind Omi’s murder. To this day I’ve kept the letter my mother had addressed to her. I found it blowing around the room on the morning I discovered the body. For some unknown reason, I just never took the trouble of showing it to somebody who could have translated it for me – until yesterday. I asked a fellow here to take a look at it. He said he’d have it ready by this morning’s exercise period. I should know within the next few hours…

Somehow, I just can’t imagine it’ll make much difference, no matter what it says. I will, however, add it as a footnote to this writing in any case.1
________________________________________________
1 Dear Mother,

Imagine me calling you “dear” – or “mother”, for that matter – even as you’ve managed to make me into the stump of a woman I am today. I’m sure that the war had a lot to do with it. We’ve all suffered. But whereas some are uplifted by their pain and others are crushed, a few are reduced to a rare distillate of evil. You, dear mother, fall into the latter unfortunate category.

The evidence stacks up overwhelmingly against you. There’s more than enough to justify an indictment of this nature. While it is true that no court would convict you, God knows of your crimes and will judge you accordingly. Must I really remind you of the facts that condemn you?

When war broke out over the continent, it took our father first. He never returned but may still be alive somewhere, especially as his name never appeared on any of the long lists of the fallen. It may just be that he saw a chance to escape your lethal schemes and took it. I wouldn’t blame him if he did.

Then there was my poor brother, L. Being an only son he was not required to enlist. Yet you insisted he do so, using his sexual preference against him to drive your point. “Prove you’re a man,” you chided, adding, “There’s opportunity in war. You owe it to yourself to go out and bring back your share.” L. went and was killed within a month.

Then, when the enemy came knocking on our gates and we were advised to clear out or face the firing squads, we overloaded the wagons and headed west. We still had a long way to go when the horses died and we were forced to abandon everything – all, except that black trunk of yours which we continued to drag over the rutted roads and across the charred fields. When we were hungry, you hiked up my skirts for the men, and sometimes we ate.

We crossed several borders, dragging that old trunk on which I was made to dance until my feet bled.

Finally, we arrived here. The local population had been decimated; and those who survived were happy to accept the influx of strangers willing and able to work. With few exceptions, nobody had much to speak of. In this, everyone was equal – and that much was good. Partnerships were forged with the goal of rebuilding a nation. Friendships were formed, based on trust. It was utopia for a time until possessions would once again begin to build barriers between us.

It should have been a good time for us as well. But we were the exception. From the moment we arrived, it was obvious to all that we had money. You flaunted it at every turn. Our home was large enough to house ten families. You hired servants who stole from you and talked behind our backs. You sent me to school in clothes that were many times better than what the others could afford. I put on weight. None of my classmates would talk to me.

Later, you’d bring around men who drove motorcars. You scolded me for being deliberately dull. Finally, you tricked me into marrying the worst of the bunch. I understand he made his fortune during the war (like you expected L. to do) digging out the gold from the teeth of the dead. He abused me repeatedly and you always took his side. I intentionally aborted two pregnancies because I feared for the future of these children. Then he abandoned me.

When I met Martin, the bottle washer, I no longer cared. Somehow he fell in love with me and proposed marriage. I never loved him; that much was true. But, for the first time in my life, another human being treated me with kindness and respect. We were married despite your objections.

After Uwe was born, something extraordinary came over me. I felt stirrings I had thought no longer possible. And even in my now diminished state, I vow to use what strength I can muster to protect him from the madness of our generation.

May the good Lord forgive me!

---------------------------------------------
As none of us is ever entirely confident of the ways in which we seek to fulfill our individual destinies, all of us must grapple with guilt. Guilt is by far the heaviest burden any man can be asked to carry. Guilt is always plentiful. It is commonly traded like currency; and, like currency, its value floats according to what the market will bear. Beyond that, guilt is largely illusory, a ruse often raised in support of political ambition. It works because things are never simply black and white; seldom does one find a signed confession at the proverbial crime scene; seldom a suicide note. Only the artist is afforded the luxury of a guiltless enclave. As he commands total control of his space – the colors on his palette; the clay in his hands; his words on paper; etc. - he remains at liberty to fill in whatever uncertainties may arise with whatever he may be moved to show - while the rest of us remain in constant need of forgiveness.

Monday, November 8, 2010

Even As Everything Else Lies In Ruins


The unspoken voice in every region (of the world) is the U.S.’s It is the dog that isn’t barking. Every one of our foreign policy thrusts in recent years has failed precisely because we have refused to back it up with sufficient resolve, especially in terms of military power. In an effort to appease the anti-war crowd, we have hamstrung ourselves, bending our worldview into utopian hookah smoke rings. We have come to rely solely on empty rhetoric, endless negotiations, and paying out IOU bribes and/or ransom.

It’s all come to a head under Obama who will not even defend America’s political parties, its people and borders. He asserts time and time again that war is never an option; that we can and should not interfere; that our interference is (and always has been) intrinsically evil; that he will now lead by example; that we will disarm unilaterally; get out of the Middle East; continue to whittle down Israel’s defenses; and leave Asia to sort out its own. The planet can ultimately only benefit if mass slaughter should ensue.

We have boldly retreated from the world of Maya. If there are battles to be fought, they are to be fought here at home. We must accommodate the lecherous demands of thieves and tyrants. We must abandon our principles. We must surrender.

Any opposition to our new, progressive policy of appeasement must be severely dealt with; backbones surgically paralyzed. We must shun nationalism - especially our own. Tyranny is relative and will play itself out when one of the combatants - under spell of epiphany - voluntarily leaves the ring.

The world has noted the change. Though it’s been long in coming, under Obama it’s now official. This is why now all the would-be tyrants are making their moves. They’re out looting the granary while the going is good.

I’m not saying there’s not a kind of textbook elegance to what Obama believes. However, it’s a fiction. It can never be real. While the people can absorb a good fight for God and country, they will never stand idly by and watch their identity be trampled. In this, the leaders of Russia, Japan, China and Iran are far more ’democratic’ than our highly ‘enlightened’ ivory tower policy wonks. They are playing to their people directly, while we leave ours dangling over the abyss - with nothing to believe in; nothing to fight for or hold dear.

The end game is at hand. Both, the king and queen are in mortal danger. Once the queen is sacrificed, checkmate is at hand. Game over never involves the actual taking of the king. Obama is betting that this last convention will hold. He means to remain, even as everything else lies in ruins.

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Sunday, October 10, 2010

Kanthapura


The hard Left is not only anti-American; they’ve now ratcheted up the stakes and revealed themselves as being anti-human as well: Anything non-human must be preserved and protected at the expense of individuals. To the Left, humans are evil interlopers on a near-perfect planet. It is no wonder that they support abortion, eugenics and land grabs.

There’s something sick in this and the sickness has now spilled over into our politics. Except, they think we’re sick as well. We are often all too quick to accept their premise, after which point they’ve already won the argument.

Environmentalism has become as potent as Islam. When one flies internationally these days, the screen on the back of the seat in front of you shows the aircraft’s progress across the oceans and over the landmasses. The maps fail to show borders. Often there’s a disclaimer, saying that the maps are non-political; that national borders are deliberately omitted. There are so many border disputes at the moment, the airlines thought it best to avoid the issue entirely. Instead, only the locations of towns are given. These then can be seen as city states while the land around them is a kind of no-man’s land - fly-over country - to be randomly allotted to service the cities as is deemed appropriate. Nations are no longer willing to defend national borders. And indeed, the whole concept of national borders is rapidly growing irrelevant.

What is growing in importance is ideology. And ideology knows no borders. It has long been a dream of the Left to erase all borders and become global. The promise is peace. Unfortunately, conflict will never disappear. There will always be killing. In fact, in the absence of borders, wars may become even more virulent and deadly - as in civil war; pitting neighbor against neighbor, brother against brother, etc.

How does one fight such a war?

I have recently read “Kanthapura”, a novel by Raja Rao. In it he describes a winning strategy. He details how Gandhi’s influence on the grass roots built an invincible army against which the Crown could not win. The secret was peaceful resistance - with an emphasis on ‘peaceful’.

Most trouble in the world originates with ego. Take ego out of the equation, and one literally becomes invincible. This is a lesson the Tea Parties should take to heart, for the fight is drawing near. As the concept of borders crumbles and the emphasis shifts to ideology, the great armies that have so heroically defended us in the past become increasingly useless. We will need to depend largely on ourselves for survival. Rao’s Gandhi may have shown us the way.

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

The Meaning of 'Destroy'


This backyard exercise by the president reminds me of French film, “Joyeux Noël” (‘05) about the WWI Christmas truce of December 1914, depicted through the eyes of French, Scottish and German soldiers. One minute the adversaries are cowering in trenches, shelling the b’Jesus out of each other; the next, they are singing Christmas songs, drinking and eating together; and, later, burying their dead. It was based on a true story and had a tear-jerker of a plot, showing the futility of war. Naturally, liberals liked it and wondered why the whole world could not be (re)painted in sad and pretty colors.

POTUS is waging a PR blitz throughout the country. People say they like him personally; they just don’t like his policies. This is a cop-out and a win for a president who wants to destroy our nation. It will gain him more time to do it.

Let me just take a moment to define the word ’destroy’. ’Destroy’ in war means killing and breaking things; in politics it means rendering the opposition impotent. It does not mean change, improve, or compromise. It does not mean win-win. It does not mean working together as a unit to make things better for all.

To destroy means tearing down a house for the purpose of building a mosque in its place. Destroyers have no regard for the destroyed. If the destroyed happen to still be alive, their utility is exploited; they are enslaved. My grandfather was a medical doctor in his time. When the Russians killed all others, they spared his life only because they needed his services. He became a slave. Not only black people have had the singular experience of having been slaves.

I have seen enough to know that Obama does not like any part of this country that elected him to the highest office in the land. Perhaps the ultimate fault for this situation - and it is a situation - lies with the people who could not think far enough out of the box to anticipate 9/11. And with those who elected him as a remedy for some unspecified ailment; and he turned out to be poison. We’re like babes in the woods. We haven’t learned yet which mushrooms to pick and which berries; and which ones to leave be. Someone along the way should have taught us what to look out for.

http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Friday, September 17, 2010

The Man On the Moon


Normally, we can predict things only on the basis of what has already happened. Since, with Obama's election, we entered into a new paradigm, long range predictions are impossible. No doubt, Republicans are set to win big on November 2nd. What happens afterwards, however, is entirely up in the air.

Here’s what we do know will happen: Republicans will indeed be judged by very strict standards. Just one child going hungry anywhere in America will be found and hung around Republican's necks (even if all the others are well-fed to the point of obesity). Republicans will be paraded endlessly with this single hapless child around their collective necks in every public square and forum. If, on the other hand, Democrats should continue with their majorities as before, any increase in the nation's poverty rate will be utterly ignored by the press.

Democrats adhere to no standards. They do not allow themselves to be judged. The press will never judge them as they are considered kissing cousins.

I'm afraid our steady advance towards the abyss will not stop or reverse under Republican rule. It can only slow as Republicans are always ready to compromise by at least half. Incest has always been a powerful player in Washington/DC. In this way, we cannot avoid reaching the wall.

When there’s no other way out, usually a war comes along to sort everything out. Think of a pressure cooker. The steam at present is quite sufficient to satisfy several meal tickets. It is not yet enough to blow the kettle sky-high. Two more years of Obama should do the trick. We may yet be able to put that man on the moon after all.

http://peterkoelliker.blogspot.com/
http://pkoelliker.blogspot.com/

Thursday, August 19, 2010

Clash of Civilizations


Paul Harvey used to preface some of his stories by saying, “It’s not one world.” It isn’t. Howard Dean has not suddenly become Republican or conservative. He is and will (most likely always) be a socialist. Hillary Clinton is a socialist. Obama, at the very least, is a socialist. ‘Big government’ is fundamental to socialist thinking.

At the same time, socialists are not suicidal. They do not check their common sense at the door. They know that in order to survive as a viable alternative, they cannot totally ignore certain political realities. For Muslims to build a 13-story mosque in close proximity to Ground Zero is simply a bad idea, unless we fail to understand that Muslims have declared war on us; that they cannot be appeased or bargained with; that any altruistic gesture we might intend will not make them like us, and will be proclaimed a victory for their side, allowing them to propagandize and recruit in continuance of their war against us.

In a recent exchange with a friend about ultimate causes, it came to me that the fundamental difference between man and animal is ego. I had it right, but I did not go far enough.

We’d been putting bones out on the driveway after supper with the expectation of seeing them gone by morning. We’d often wondered just who our nocturnal visitor might be. We imagined any number of the ‘friendly’ animals we’d become familiar with over the years of living here. After an overnight blanketing of fresh winter snow, their various tracks cross the lawn in every conceivable direction. Most of these we can readily identify.

Last night I had to go out for milk. When I returned, I happened to see the interloper in my headlights. I still can’t tell you what it was: larger than a cat; smaller than most dogs; large pointy ears; protruding snout; thin, spindly legs. There have been reports of fox and/or coyote in our neighborhood, but I’ve seen the fox in daylight and it wasn’t that.

I almost felt sorry for the intruder. He looked so frail and wobbly, and nervous to boot. We don’t put scraps out every day. I imagined him coming by on days when we don’t - and being hungry. It also occurred to me that he - as most any animal - had no arms and was obliged to eat directly off the ground. The difference between us, I reasoned, is that we at some point decided to get up on our hind legs and remained that way. This allowed our front legs to develop into arms, hands and fingers with which we could do things. We could now build something and say, “I did that. It’s mine.” - hence, ego.

Thought would develop similarly as well - based on differing assumptions - into different appendages. Ayaan Hirsi Ali in an opinion article in yesterday's WSJ entitled “How to Win the Clash of Civilizations” briefly summarizes the late Samuel Huntington’s assertion that “the essential building blocks of the post-Cold War world are seven or eight historical civilizations of which the Western, the Muslim and the Confucian are the most important.

The balance of power among these civilizations, Huntington argued, is shifting. The West is declining in relative power, Islam is exploding demographically, and Asian civilizations—especially China—are economically ascendant. Huntington also said that a civilization-based world order is emerging in which states that share cultural affinities will cooperate with each other and group themselves around the leading states of their civilization.

Ali concludes: “The West's universalist pretensions are increasingly bringing it into conflict with the other civilizations, most seriously with Islam and China. Thus the survival of the West depends on Americans, Europeans and other Westerners reaffirming their shared civilization as unique—and uniting to defend it against challenges from non-Western aggressors (sic)."

Saturday, August 14, 2010

He Did Not


It does seem like many Americans must be hit in the head with two-by-fours before they finally realize what’s actually happening. The trouble is that a blow like that is also likely to render the victim unconscious. It is now clear that ever since 9/11, some - if not most - of us have been rendered unconscious. This is not to say that the forces that are bedeviling us today had not been gathering long before the towers came down. 9/11, however, should have served as a wake-up call. It didn’t.

I am amused by reports that consistently prefix their findings with words such as ‘unexpected’ and ‘surprising’. There were many who predicted exactly where we were headed years ago. I myself remember saying that Barack Hussein Obama was destined to chauffeur the hearse to America’s final resting place. We seemed to be okay with that.

9/11 was an attack on what? America’s source of strength: its economy (and to a lesser extent on its military). It succeeded in bringing down the manifestation of that strength in unambiguous, most spectacular fashion. Less of our people died in the Japanese attack on Peal Harbor than did on 9/11. You would think that that would have meant something. Instead, our government to this day still has a problem in defining the enemy. And as such, it’s strategy is in disarray: unfocused, scattered, ad hoc, and - in large part - turned in against itself.

Bush meant well when he said, “If you’re not with us, you’re against us.” Almost immediately our enemies - both here and abroad - sprang into action and began to ridicule him. Our domestic enemies turned out to be far more effective, turning ridicule into high art; a national pastime. They got what they wanted. They gave us Obama.

Now that it’s become clear where our nation is ultimately headed, everyone acts surprised. As a WSJ reader points out today, ‘unintended’ is not the same as ‘unforeseen’. Whereas everything reported today is couched in ‘unintended’ (surprise); nothing was ever so obscure as to escape prediction. We are being attacked on so many fronts, it’s difficult to keep one’s focus. Unless we’re willing to admit (to ourselves) that we’re in a war, and address the enemy appropriately, our fortunes will continue to wane. The ‘mosque on Ground Zero’ controversy is a case and point: Half of us do not recognize that Islam is at war with us, while all of Islam is utterly convinced of it.

Yesterday, the president of the United States spoke out for the first time on the mosque controversy. I wish he had said, “If you’re not with us, you’re against us.” He didn’t.

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Metrics


We do not have an economic crisis. We have a crisis in leadership. The ‘bad’ economy is merely a symptom of the crisis in leadership world-wide. The economy is not fragile. It is not failing. It is telling us precisely about the state the world finds itself in.

If you use a thermometer to check your child’s temperature and find he has a fever, a reasonable response should not be to blame the thermometer; to pack it in ice or throw it down in a rage. Yet this is exactly what we’re doing. The economy is merely a metric - a tool - a device to measure the relative health of a nation(’s overall policies). A tool can never exceed its function. As policy is always contingent on mercurial political demands, the economy can be said to reflect the relative soundness of political realities as well.

In an effort to build (false) constituencies, politicians have taken the value out of work. They’ve taken winning out of the game. They’ve taken the truth out of history. They’re taking the killing out of war. They’re taking the people out of governance. In doing all that, they’ve taken hope out of the future. What they’re attempting here amounts to no less than a man-made contingency operation; attempting to change the world into what it has never been before – into what it can never be. It’s no wonder alarm bells are going off everywhere you look.

If it were merely theft, it might be a blessing. The thief is caught and punished. The victim either writes off his loss and begins again, or he is in some way compensated. Either way, there is closure. What we’re witnessing at the G8 summit in Toronto is not theft. It is trying to change the way things actually work; it is trying to upend the laws of gravity. It is going against nature without the temperance of conscience, without an understanding of trespass onto the sacred ground of reality.

You don’t go about building a machine in which every module is wholly dependent on every other. You build it so that failing modules can be easily swapped out. You don’t build an oil tanker (or submarine) without breaking it up in to compartments. If one should be breached, it can be sealed off and the rest of the ship survives. “Too big to fail” spells disaster and worse. In fact, if “too big to fail” should become the norm, we will no longer be able to tell what is disaster and what is not. There will no longer be anything to compare. Every traditional standard loses its meaning. What is is. No further argument is possible. This, plain and simple, is the definition of tyranny.

The reason America’s economic metrics are bad is not because of some vague notion of the failure as relates some equally vague academic construct. (“You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.”) It is a failure that originates and is maintained by the people themselves. In our set-up it is the result of people rebelling against a self-serving, wrong-headed, oppressive, ruling class. The people themselves produce all the metrics needed. Governments ultimately serve at the will of the people. Without their acquiescence, government is illegitimate. The metrics tell us that this has now become the case.