Rules for radicals

I continue to believe it takes smarts to be elected POTUS. I never believed, as many did, that Bush was dumb. Neither do I believe that Obama and the people behind his meteoric rise to power are dumb. Bush basically failed because the (I'll be kind and call them) ‘Democrats’ with help from academe and the press mounted a formidable campaign against him; initially, on the basis of party politics alone. The political rancor got so intense and chaotic; it weakened not just individuals but both parties as well. This allowed the weaker of the two to be infiltrated and eventually taken over by radical elements. Today, it is a misnomer to call Democrats ‘Democrats’. They are, strictly speaking, Marxists.

Obama has no opposition. We must then assume that whatever happens has been carefully planned, including confusion and chaos.

In Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” the message is clear: “A revolutionary organizer must shake up the prevailing patterns of their (middle class) lives—agitate (my emphasis), create disenchantment and discontent with the current values, to produce, if not a passion for change, at least a passive, affirmative, non-challenging climate.” Through agitation on multiple fronts the community organizer, Obama, hopes to overwhelm the system and render it broken and unable to meet the people’s (especially the middle class’) expectations. According to Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals”, a book our current president has most assuredly read (and quite possibly committed to memory) – a book about how to bring about a Marxist revolution in America – the people must be rendered “…numb, bewildered, scared into silence. They don’t know what, if anything, they can do. This” he says, “is the job for today’s radical—to fan the embers of hopelessness into a flame...”